For An Annual Commitment Of Just $5 - Become An Individual Subscriber/Supporter Of
Subscriber Log In

Recent News

More news >>

In Yet ‘Another Unfortunate Example’ Of President Trump’s ‘Willingness To Talk A Big Game About Being Pro-Union While His Actions Clearly Contradict That,’ The White House ‘Vows To Veto’ The PRO Act’s Worker Protections

Published Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:00 am
by IBEW News
In Yet ‘Another Unfortunate Example’ Of President Trump’s ‘Willingness To Talk A Big Game About Being Pro-Union While His Actions Clearly Contradict That,’ The White House ‘Vows To Veto’ The PRO Act’s Worker Protections

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) - One day before 224 Members of the U.S. House of Representatives from both parties voted to approve a bill to make it easier for Working People to join Labor Unions - the White House issued a strongly worded statement opposing the measure. 

“This is ‘another unfortunate example’ of (Republican) President (Donald) Trump’s ‘willingness to talk a big game about being Pro-Union while his actions clearly contradict that,’” International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Director of Political and Legislative Affairs Austin Keyser.

As passed by the majority Pro-Worker House, the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act contains a number of reforms designed to benefit all Working People, such as modernizing the definition of Unfair Labor Practices (ULPs) and allowing fines or lawsuits against employers who try to keep Workers from forming Workplace Bargaining Units.

But the Trump Administration’s statement largely ignored the PRO Act’s wide range of Pro-Worker reforms.  It falsely claimed, among other things, that the act’s provisions would violate Workers’ privacy.

In reality, the measure calls for simply modernizing and codifying decades of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rulemaking to ensure employers provide things as job classifications, mobile phone numbers and e-mail addresses - alongside the other already required information - of Employees who are set to vote in Workplace Representation Elections.

The statement also asserts - again, erroneously - that the PRO Act would abolish with one stroke the so-called Right-To-Work (for less) Laws that currently allow Employees in 27 states to reap the benefits of being in a Union without contributing to support the basic costs of maintaining those benefits.

What the bill actually aims to do is amend these laws to allow Unions to fairly collect the funds they need to adequately represent all of the Workers in a given Bargaining Unit, even those who choose not to become Union Members.

And despite what the White House claims, the bill would not “kill jobs and destroy the Gig Economy,” nor does it simply mimic California’s recently passed Assembly Bill 5.  That particular law codified the recent unanimous ruling by the California Supreme Court in the Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court case, making it harder for employers to misclassify Workers as Independent Contractors and cheat them out of their deserved pay and benefits.

The PRO Act takes things beyond that law by creating in Federal Law a clear pathway for defining employment, a definition that would have a positive effect on the organizing efforts of Labor Organizations - and more importantly, would improve the lives of misclassified Workers and their families.

One thing the White House statement managed to get right is the PRO Act’s support for the First Amendment rights of Union-represented workers.

The 1947 Taft-Hartley Act forbids so-called “Secondary Boycotts,” where Union Members peacefully picket or refuse to deal with Non-Union shops or goods.

The PRO Act attempts to amend Federal Labor Law to better align it with recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have determined restrictions like those under Taft-Hartley infringe on a Worker’s constitutionally guaranteed Free Speech Rights.

Even though the act is likely dead on arrival in the Senate, where the Republican majority has largely ignored Worker-friendly legislation, IBEW International President Lonnie R. Stephenson is encouraging Union Members to call their Senators and register their support for it: “The White House’s statement is an ‘obvious attempt to pivot and change the conversation about the PRO Act.’  ‘That’s a good indication that Working People are actually on the right track.’”

You can reach your Senators’ Capitol Hill Offices at (202) 224-3121 and you can find their district office contact information at

To Directly Access This Labor News Story, Go To:




Leave a Comment