For An Annual Commitment Of Just $5 - Become An Individual Subscriber/Supporter Of
Subscriber Log In
New York Alliance for Retired Americans WNY Chapter of NYSARA
Stephen Muscarella, President
NYS PEF Retirees


With More Than 500,000 Retired Union Members Living Across New York State Today, Including More Than 100,000 Right Here in Western New York, is Proud to be Working With the Representatives of the Western New York Chapter of the New York State Alliance For Retired Americans (NYSARA) in Order to Provide Union Retirees With a Variety of Labor News and Information They Need and Just Won’t Find Anywhere Else.

The Western New York Chapter of the New York Alliance For Retired Americans Serves as the Base for Providing Union Retirees a Voice that Can Be Heard.

Stephen Muscarella is NYSARA’s President Here in Western New York and Also Serves as President of the New York State Public Employees Federation (PEF).

For More Information on the Western New York Chapter of the New York State Alliance For Retired Americans and How You Can Get Involved, Contact Stephen Muscarella Directly Via E-Mail at

Recent News

More news >>

From Paul Solman Makes A Point - Why Raising the Social Security Retirement Age Makes ‘No Sense

Published Sunday, January 27, 2013 11:00 am
by Via Editor’s Note: Your Regional, On-Line Labor Newspaper found this Column by Paul Solman on  You can go directly to this Column at:


Paul Solman: We write a lot about Social Security on this Page.  Recently, our Resident Expert Ask Larry Kotlikoff and I got into a tiff about ways to make the Program solvent.

One of the possible fixes I mentioned was extending the Retirement Age, which I reported on at length some years ago.  Recently, Jared Bernstein weighed in on Social Security Solvency and did not include Age-Extension among his suggestions.

Here is another take on Social Security, this time from Teresa Ghilarducci, the Irene and Bernard L. Schwartz Chair of Economic Policy Analysis and Director of the Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis in the Department of Economics at The New School in New York.

Her 2008 book, When I'm Sixty-Four: The Plot against Pensions and the Plan to Save Them, attracted considerable attention, as did its Proposal to Create a Mandatory Government-Run Savings Plan to which Workers and Employers would supplement their Social Security Pension by contributing an additional 2.5% Payroll Tax.

I asked Teresa to add another two cents to the Age-Extension Debate and here's what she sent:

Teresa Ghilarducci: Two memorable signs at the Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert Washington, D.C., Rally in 2010 called for a Better America: "Tights are not Pants" and "What do we want? Evidence-Based Policy. When do we want it?  Now!"  Of the two Protests - one on Fashion and the other on Policy-Reform Processes - the latter deserves close attention.

The ever-present, but very unpopular, Policy Proposal to Raise the Age to collect full Social Security Benefits from 67 to 69 or 70 - which Cuts Lifetime Benefits for all Recipients, especially for those who have Shorter-Life Expectancies and collect Social Security well before age 67 - needs to be based on evidence.  Unfortunately, there is a Commonly-Held Belief that the Physical and Mental Demands of Older Workers' Jobs have improved.   But the evidence, however, shows that belief to be wrong.  The truth is the exact opposite: the Physical and Mental Demands of Older Workers' Jobs have increased since 1992.

Anthony Bonen, a Graduate Research Assistant in our Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis at The New School, recently presented numbers from the University of Michigan's Health and Retirement Study to show the Degradation in Job Quality for Older Americans from 1992-2008.  The shocking fact is that Jobs for Older Americans have gotten more Mentally and Physically difficult.  This is actually quite consistent, however, with a Gradual Decline in Older Workers' Bargaining Power, as evidenced by Falling Older Worker Pay and Increasing Long-Term Unemployment Rates.

New York Times Reporters Steve Greenhouse and Michael Barbaro revealed an embarrassing internal memo to Wal-Mart's Board of Directors in 2005 that revealed the Corporation's motives and methods to make work harder for Older Workers.  The leaked Wal-Mart Memo "proposes numerous ways to Hold Down Spending on Health Care and other Benefits" by ensuring every Job required Physical Tasks - Stocking Shelves, Gathering Carts - which should discourage Unhealthy and Older Workers from Obtaining and/or Retaining Employment at the Retailer.

Older Workers between Ages 62 and 65 (62 is the Earliest Eligibility Age for early Social Security Retirement Benefits) especially have seen their Job Quality degrade by having increasingly more Physically and Mentally-Demanding Jobs.

Between 1992 and 2008, this Age Group reported a whopping 24% Decrease in easy Jobs - those that never require lifting heavy loads.  Indeed, a decreasing proportion of these Workers Age 62 to 65 said their Job never requires lifting heavy loads.

And not all Physical Toil involves lifting.  From 1992 to 2008, the proportion of Jobs requiring good eyesight increased by about 30% for Workers Aged 50-61, and a huge 79% increase in the share of Jobs that require good eyesight for the Oldest Group (Age 62 to 65).

Admittedly, there was a slight improvement in the Physical Demands of work for Young and Middle-Older Workers - an approximately 10% fall in the proportion of Jobs that require lots of physical effort all of the time from 1992 to 2008.

But across all American Workers, that effect has been overwhelmed by more heavy lifting.

When asked if their Job required lifting heavy loads all of the time, the overall rate has gone up substantially and there has been more than a 25% increase in Jobs that require stooping, kneeling or crouching all the time.

What's happening? - you may wonder.

Haven't Traditional Shop Floor, Blue-Collar Manufacturing Jobs decreased and the heavy lifting along with them?

Yes, but the big secret is that ever-more-demanding Service Jobs have taken their place.

The implications of the data should be clear: in their on-going Fiscal Policy Negotiations, Lawmakers should not raise the Social Security and Medicare Eligibility Age.

Evidence shows many Older Workers are simply not able to work past Traditional Retirement Age without Substantial Suffering.

Reducing their Retirement Income and throwing them off Medical Insurance will create a new cohort of Impoverished Elderly, reversing the tangible gains in reducing Old-Age Poverty made since the Great Depression.

Is there a way to distinguish between Workers who need to retire on time - about Age 67 or earlier - and those, like a Television Reporter, College Teacher or a comfortable Senator - who could work longer?

There is no possible rule Government could administer to distinguish those who could or could not work.

Some Older Workers may like their Jobs and be fortunate to have Employers who like them.

They should certainly be able to work.

Policy-Makers should not Cut Social Security Benefits - wrongly thinking that Jobs are getting easier and that Old People can easily find and keep work.

Cutting Social Security, Medicare and/or Medicaid Benefits is terrible Public Policy because Senior Citizens who can least afford it will be the most grievously hurt.


Leave a Comment provides the following links to a number of helpful and useful Union Plus Programs:
Consumer Reports Health and Best Buy Drugs:
Health Savings Programs:
Call 1-877-570-4945 or visit
Hospital Care Grants:
Medical Bill Negotiation Service:
On-line Prescription Discount Card:
Wellness Programs:
Visit, which provides an array of information on a number of money-saving programs that can keep your family and finances in good health: