For An Annual Commitment Of Just $5 - Become An Individual Subscriber/Supporter Of WNYLaborToday.com
Subscriber Log In

Union Retiree News From The Alliance For Retired Americans: Alliance’s 2011 Voting Record: A Breakdown Of The Findings & House Passes Ryan Budget/Alternatives Rejected

Also… Seniors, Others Await Fate Of Health Reform as Supreme Court Hears Arguments

Published Sunday, April 1, 2012 5:00 pm
by Alliance For Retired Americans

Alliance’s 2011 Voting Record: A Breakdown Of The Findings

To mark the two-year anniversary of Health Care Reform, the Alliance For Retired Americans last week released its 2011 Voting Record. Every year, the report details the votes of each U.S. Senator and Representative on key issues affecting current and future Retirees, and the latest version is available at http://www.retiredamericans.org/issues/congressional-voting-record.  The voting record examines 10 key Senate votes and 10 key House votes made in 2011, showing the roll calls on issues such as Health Care Repeal; The Paul Ryan Budget - which had a vote in both the House and Senate; and a Balanced Budget Amendment.  “Higher scores on the voting record reflect a commitment to improve Health Care, strengthen Medicare, and put Seniors ahead of Drug and Insurance Companies,” Alliance President Barbara Easterling said.  According to the Alliance, 155 U.S. House Members achieved perfect scores of 100% in 2011.  Two hundred and twenty-eight received scores of zero.  The strong polarization reflects the voting record of the Freshman Class of the U.S. House and enforced party discipline.  Of the 84 Freshmen Republicans elected in the 2010 Mid-Term Elections, 73 received a score of zero.  Twenty-six members of the U.S. Senate achieved perfect scores of 100% in 2011, while another 26 received zeroes.

 

House Passes Ryan Budget/Alternatives Rejected

The U.S. House approved a 2013 Budget Resolution from Budget Committee Chairman Ryan (Republican-Wisconsin) last week by a 228-to-191 vote.  Only 10 GOP House Members defected.  They were Republicans Justin Amash (Michigan), Joe Barton (Texas), John Duncan (Tennnessee), Chris Gibson (New York), Tim Huelskamp (Kansas), Walter Jones (North Carolina), David McKinley (West Virginia), Todd Platts (Pennsylvania), Dennis Rehberg (Montana), and Ed Whitfield (Kentucky).  For a complete tally of the vote, go to http://1.usa.gov/GW8kpD.  This year and last, all Democrats voted “no” on the House GOP Budget.  Ryan’s $3.5 trillion plan is considered deeply-flawed by many Senior Activists.  Under the plan, the Medicare eligibility age would slowly rise to agec67.  Those who turn 65 after 2023 would receive Government Assistance buying a Private Health Insurance Plan, but the spending would be capped, meaning costs would be shifted to Seniors as Insurance Costs rise.  “The House GOP Budget Proposal lays bare the party’s ‘true colors.’  The plan would cut Health Care for Senior Citizens in order to pay for more tax breaks for big corporations and for the wealthiest Americans.  It is unconscionable to take from those with the least – Seniors trying to afford to see a doctor and fill a prescription – in order to give to those who already have the most,” Alliance Executive Director Edward Coyle said.  Actor Martin Sheen, widely known for his presidential role on the TV Program “The West Wing,” recently joined the anti-GOP movement, slamming the conservatives for their attacks on Medicare in a video.  Click http://bit.ly/GSiFHU to see it.  A Simpson-Bowles-style budget that contained drastic spending cuts, pushed by Jim Cooper (Democrat-Tennessee) and Steve LaTourette (Republican-Ohio), went down 382-to-38 last week (see tally at http://1.usa.gov/H24r4f).  House Democrats had released a budget proposal that would begin to curb deficits without making major changes to Medicare and Medicaid, pairing spending cuts with higher taxes on the wealthy.  Authored by U.S. Representative Chris Van Hollen (Maryland), the House Budget Committee’s top Democrat, the $3.7 trillion budget plan was shot down by a vote of 163-to-262. For a tally of that vote, click http://1.usa.gov/H2uyLk.

 

Seniors, Others Await Fate Of Health Reform as Supreme Court Hears Arguments

Seniors were among the many supporters and opponents of the 2010 Health Care Law keeping a close eye on the Supreme Court last week, as the Court heard oral arguments on the case to overturn the Affordable Care Act.  At the center of the case is whether the mandate to buy Health Insurance is constitutional.  In arguing their side in the press, supporters of the law highlighted all of the benefits that millions of Americans have received thanks to the law’s provisions.  The Maryland/DC Alliance for Retired Americans was one of several organizations present at the front of the Supreme Court and their members expressed their confidence that the law is constitutional.  The court’s ruling, which is set to come in June, could change the interpretation of Congress’ scope of power and have major implications for Modern Government.  Should Health Care Reform be struck down, Seniors risk losing many of the new benefits provided through the law. The shrinking Doughnut Hole - the coverage gap that leaves Seniors paying thousands out of pocket for lifesaving medications - will open back up, leaving many to pay much more for vital and costly medications.  The Free Preventive Care and Annual Wellness Visit benefits that are now offered will disappear as well.  “If any part of the law is repealed, Seniors could lose a great deal of their health care protection and security,” said Ruben Burks, Secretary-Treasurer of the Alliance. “In addition, Medicare Advantage overpayments to insurance companies could end, meaning that Medicare's Trust Fund would run out sooner.”

Comments

Leave a Comment